Free enterprise

WHAT IS FREE ENTERPRISE?

Alan Greenspan and Dick Cheney, high above America. Greenspan flies Rothschild’s facade of ‘economy’ with a co-pilot known only by the name, ‘Representative Government.’
Alan Greenspan and Dick Cheney, high above America. Greenspan flies Rothschild’s facade of ‘economy’ with a co-pilot known only by the name, ‘Representative Government.’
John Kenneth Galbraith

“The study of money, above all other fields… is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it.”

FREE ENTERPRISE UNDER NATURE

Free enterprise is the innate desire of all true contributors to prosperity, because it is the singular condition by which they receive according to their doings.

Under natural conditions, prosperity is limited only by our willingness to process natural resources into production. A person working by their self acquires all that they produce, no less than what they produce, and no more than what they produce. The cost of their production is only the effort of production. No benefit exists in trading the product of their toil for less. To preclude a person acquiring the equal of their production then, is to preclude free enterprise.

Under true free enterprise alone therefore, is full prosperity realized. Under true free enterprise alone is prosperity comprised of unimpeded effort, delivering undiminished production to consumption, for the product of equal toil. No obstruction to full prosperity exists. No instability exists in trade. The value of production is neither diminished nor magnified by any unnatural influence.

FAIR TRADE AND NATURAL DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

Under natural conditions, fair trade is the unimpeded, constant ability to exchange assented equivalents. Each party, by free and unimpeded standards, determines what quantity and quality of toil is the acceptable equivalent of their own. No concept of unearned profit can prevail, because essential toil is the measure of the value of production.

There is no qualifiable concept of justified “profit” beyond production, for if trade is determined to be fair, it has been determined to be an exchange of equivalent, essential toil. If a “fair” and therefore equal proportion of “profit” were to be applied coequally to equivalent toil, the “fair profit” of each would cancel the other’s.
CONSEQUENCES OF ALTERING WHAT PORTION OF A CIRCULATION CAN BE DEVOTED TO TRADE

For true producers, intending free enterprise, the one and only purpose of a circulation is to sustain trade.

As all wealth can only be shared from the pool of production, any existence of unearned profit precludes the desire and ability of producers to receive according to their doings. The more unearned profit is taken from the pool of production, the less producers receive according to their doings, because from the one pool of wealth (production), the wealth of the undeserving can only be unjustifiably increased at the expense of the deserving.

In free enterprise therefore, ALL of a circulation is always devoted only to trade. This applies as well to products or services ostensibly provided by government. In true free enterprise, the cost of government must be kept to the true cost of essential toil involved in providing government. The cost of government cannot be multiplied, or free enterprise cannot exist.
[CENTRAL BANK] “CAPITALISM” AND FREE ENTERPRISE ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE
Look into my eyes. ‘The study of money, above all other fields… is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it.’ — John Kenneth Galbraith

In the wake of Rothschild, and in the strict tradition of non-disclosure characterizing history’s usurers, Alan Greenspan tells the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the ostensible truths which perpetuate usury. What after all is the nature of “economy”; and why after all is it, that under the “central banking” systems of the world, debt is multiplied in proportion to commerce and the circulation, that consequently, true producers cannot acquire the full measure of their work, and the productive capacities of the world itself are perched at the brink of insoluble debt?

Because interest multiplies debt in proportion to a circulation, maldistribution of wealth is an inherent and intended characteristic of central banking systems. All resultant instability and iniquity are artificially imposed, and manifest entirely from the fact just economy is prevented from existing. Because central banking systems multiply debt in proportion to the circulation, not only are “capitalism” and free enterprise mutually exclusive; capitalism makes central bankers the owners of all enterprise, and imposes but one ultimate reward on the producers of wealth: collapse under insoluble debt.
mike montagne — PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

mike montagne — PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™